Move On?

Casserly says he doesn't consider Cousins a top-10 QB. He didn't sound real convinced. Sounded like he was very well aware this clip could come back to haunt him.

One way of thinking is if we can't make a long term deal this year, why franchise him? Since he won't be around next, cuz financial numbers. In that case, "move on." 

Move on...to what? Seriously - move on to what? There's nothing there. An old Tony Romo? How is that better than KC? You going to sign him long term? he's going to get less injury prone, demand less salary, be around in 2-3 years?

Move on translates into start another rebuilding projected based around a gaping hole at the most important position. How does that make any sense? Any drafted QB will take years to mature. That's the rule. Dak Prescott was the exception, but what all these people are forgetting is that now the league grasps his ability, has the video on him, can plot to stop him more effectively. He will not play as well in year two as in year one, you can bet on that. So which QB used or untested are the Skins going to bring in to do better than Cousins? There isn't one. To get rid of Cousins means to go backwards, no matter who they bring in. Even if you truly don't want to pay KC, it makes sense to tag him for this year for reduced-frictional reasons alone. 

If the Redskins were to get rid of Cousins, then the whole Allen-McCloughan project falls apart. Instead of having a great offense in place, they have a big hole in the center, and their weak defense with new coaches will be under much more pressure. 

At this point, one realizes a lot of people, even pros, truly have bought the hype that Cousins is a plug in, that his success is due to those around him more than himself. He promotes this view with his words, but that's him being a leader - distributing credit, not taking it for himself. It's the outsiders, the analysts, who should be saying that he is the #1 reason for the Redskins success. Because that is the fact. But they won't do this, because that would mean crediting a white rather than a bunch of blacks, and the media are jews or those paid by them, and they hate whites. That may mean open raw racial hatred, as the Washington Post jews exhibit toward the new president. Or it may mean begrudging a white Christian QB the full measure of respect his production deserves. This deliberately fostered or honestly held misconception about his true value appears to have the Skins on the verge of a very serious mistake.

I will repeat: it is absolutely insane to do anything but sign Cousins to a long-term (5-year) contract, and it will be seen so within days of their not doing it. You don't want to settle for KC? You can do better? Who? Where? Are you out of your mind? Yes. You are out of your mind, if you believe that.

Reversing Reality: What the (((Media))) Do

Whites are smarter than blacks. It's genetic. And it's not a small gap, it's a large one. It's there in football same as elsewhere in life.

The media, owned by jews, hence (((media))), hate whites. Their hatred is ideological. That means it has nothing to do with the particulars of the white man in question. Those are just useful pretext-handles to get to the Main Theme they never depart from: whites are evil. That's the gold. The silver are the 1001 lies-change they make out of this gold. In porn, it could be that blacks have giant dicks and whites have tiny ones. It's not true. It's not factual. But it pushes the agenda. In sports, the Lie (as often assumption as overt claim) is that blacks have high ceilings whereas whites scrape by on grit. Whites are lucky to be there; if they're on the field, it's only because of discrimination or because some superior black has been injured. Whites are "lucky," while blacks have superior athletic ability. This is the myth. It is everywhere in the (((media))). It is the base assumption underlying all 'coverage.'

Whites are more complex than blacks. Complex creatures take longer to develop. The media are never ready to shut the door on a black's potential. Even years after it became apparent Robert Griffin could not read defenses nor even grasp how to avoid being hit and injured, the media continued to promote his high ceiling. By the the same token, the media were ready to bury Kirk Cousins after a single multiple-interception game. In which he was obviously pressing a bit to come back from a huge deficit, taking more risk than he would have if the score were closer. This has nothing to do with these two individuals, these racial biases in favor of blacks and against whites are found across the board in the lockstep media. The media always claim blacks have these high ceilings while looking to close the book on whites as soon as possible. But as more complex, higher creatures take long to develop, if the media were trying to be fair and discover the truth, their biases are the opposites of what they should be. Whites are for racial reasons more likely to develop over time than blacks are.

Granted, most people of any race are what they appear to be, and don't have much they're not showing, after they've played a couple seasons. But in the cases where something can be developed, it's the higher-IQ people who are going to show a higher ceiling over time. Kirk Cousins fits this precisely. Griffin does not. He's not precisely dumb the way many to most blacks are, but in a functional sense, he cannot learn from experience, or only with great difficulty. Because he keeps making the same mistakes - holding ball too long, making self-endangering runs. Those with higher IQ can see and avoid danger. Russell Wilson is a good example. He knows just how to pull up on a run and avoid injury. And not coincidentally, he's seen as the 'whitest' black QB. White is always associated with something bad, in the (((media))). Always. White men are bad. And the things that are unique to them, or encountered more frequently among them, are bad too. Their ways are bad. We must look to the future and the superior black ways of doing things. Which are better and cooler and did I say the future? This is how the media operate - always. The media = jews, and jews hate whites. We are examining their 'coverage' practices in sports, but it holds in politics and culture as well.

Not one voice in the media apart from Mike Shanahan, who is not in the media, observed what turned out to be true: that Kirk Cousins had a very much higher ceiling than was commonly believed. Yet his words were borne out. Cousins turned out to be a superior passer, one of the top 5 QBs in the league. After only two full seasons! And our guess here is that the rest of what Shanahan said will bear out: Cousins will lead the Redskins to a Super Bowl, and win it.

When Cousins had only a few starts, and pressed too hard, and had no experience, the media were quick to write him off as a typical backup mediocrity. Why? Because they wanted him to fail. They are jews (or whiteskins trained and molded by jews mentally). They hate white men. They hate christians. They hate goodlooking articulate clean-living christian white men (the Tebow theme), especially if they threaten to displace a black from a position of leadership. It damages the party line. The (((media))) want to portray running black QBs such as Griffin as the future, so anything that goes against this they cover up until it's undeniable (i.e., that Griffin is not a good QB, and was only good because he could run and no one had seen him before). And they abuse any white man who speaks the truth - the Shanahans, for instance. If you're a successful white coach, like Mike Shanahan, the fact you've won the Super Bowl doesn't matter. If what you say contradicts the ideology, you will be criticized and abused - shamelessly and endlessly. And of course, the jewish owner Daniel Snyder shares his bias with his fellow jews in the media. They both devoutly wanted Griffin to succeed, well past the point it was clear he couldn't. In fact, whatever success he did have was as much attributable to the Shanahans, as future history would show, as his own talents. Yet the Shananhans were roundly abused in the media for both holding Griffin back and not protecting him. It doesn't matter these charges are contradictory - all that matter is blaming the white man for the black's failures. Just as we see in larger society. Where whites are due no credit for their achievements but must take all responsibility for black failures.

Owning the media means you never have to say you're sorry. You're never accountable for anything. So no one except us remembers the abuse Shanahan took, let alone holds the media accountable for it. Or explains, as you read above, what actually motivates its hostility. That, again, is loxism: the jewish hatred of whites and attempt to destroy them as a group.

So long as jews control the mass media, we will see variations on the theme. Because they will never stop promoting the Big Lie that white men are evil and blacks are the future. Jews see whites as a racial enemy, and work to destroy them. Yes, destroy is the right word. Look around your country. Sports is indeed politics by other means.