Dalton Crossan, Another White Lax Player Attempting Chris Hogan Path

http://www.espn.com/blog/new-york-giants/post/_/id/51367/dalton-crossan-the-next-chris-hogan-or-maybe-even-better

4.46 speed. Played football at New Hampshire. Loves football, doesn't love lacrosse. Why wouldn't someone with blazing speed like that get a division one offer?

Good luck, Dalton Crossan.

Teammates on Cousins

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/dc-sports-bog/wp/2017/03/21/vernon-davis-redskins-teammates-think-kirk-cousins-is-spectacular/?utm_term=.a3d2a2ac4778

They believe he will come through in future, and they point out he's only started for two years. They make the same points I do.

Belichick Knows What's Up

http://deadspin.com/big-fucking-shock-1793272145

The leftists notice the Patriots are white. Can't combine this with "and they win everything all the time" yet. Baby steps.

Toward Proving Our Thesis

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/12/scot-mccloughans-real-sin-backing-cousins-over-rgi/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS

Gruden and McCloughan wanted Cousins over Griffin. Allen, the wagged tail, and the dog, Snyder, did not. McCloughan persuaded the jew to go against his racial bias and allow the coach to start the better QB.

As we "can't" write in the media that jews hate whites and use blacks to destroy them, the matter rests at the matter of personalities. Even when race is included, it is merely noted that the owner prefers blacks to whites, but this is never tied to his being a jew, nor is it tied to the consequences - losing money, losing games, losing fan support.

There's a very strong jew bias against whites - it just can't be discussed in the free press.

Dan Snyder, a Real Jew's Jew

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/redskins/tired-of-the-redskins-dysfunction-theres-one-person-to-blame/2017/03/11/2aef60dc-05d3-11e7-ad5b-d22680e18d10_story.html?utm_term=.a8abbb4a2bfb

Sally Jenkins. I havent followed the Skins closely until the last three years, but she makes a point that adds to the argument I've made, that (((Snyder))) doesn't like whites and will always choose a black who's not as good where there's a question.

Remember drafting Devin Thomas while passing on Jordy Nelson?

An article could be made of examples of the jewish owner passing on superior white players in draft (Jordy Nelson), overpaying blacks (Haynesworth, Norman, etc.), and impeding his own white players where they had demonstrated they were better than his preferred black (Griffin and Cousins).

Lost in the Hubbub

The hubbub over the unfair firing and blaming of Scot McCloughan for (what? the Skins' last two years' success?) shouldn't obscure what matters for our investment purposes: The Redskins got better the last few days, perhaps significantly better. They added a very good and interesting player in Terrelle Pryor. Very large and powerful receiver with a background playing QB. They also added some defenders who figure to be at least NFL-average at their positions. For the Redskins that's an improvement. The key is they have at least one person who can stop the run. And Cousins signed.

Come what may in 2018 and beyond, the Skins should be a good team in 2017.

Skins Blasted All Over

http://www.gq.com/story/redskin-dan-snyder-fired-gm-new-low

Drew Magary of Deadspin and, here, GQ weighs in.

Most notable is that Mike Jones, one of the Post's main beat writers, says in Tweet that someone told him last fall that jealousy at the top was the problem, and it would be resolved by using McCloughan's drinking as the excuse to can him. Which is just what happened.

There's no dispute McCloughan still drinks. The question is whether it interferes with his job, or Snyder and Allen are using that as an excuse to get out of paying the rest of his contract. Given Snyder's history, the latter is probably the case.

Pryor Says QB is a "Political" Position

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2017/01/terrelle_pryors_untold_story_f.html

Very important point, he makes. Apart from race (which is never apart), who is QB depends on a lot of non-field factors. You have to be in the right situation.

He's right, but most people don't believe it. They believe that merit always wins out. But it doesn't. There are a limited number of slots for any one position. There is a limited amount of games and practice time. All that needs to happen is wind up behind the wrong coach, the wrong starter, the wrong ownership (see Kirk Cousins) and you might not even get a chance to shine. Or you might get it too late to flower.

Well, Maybe Not

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/18863192/kirk-cousins-requesting-trade-washington-redskins

Quarterback Kirk Cousins has recently appealed to Washington Redskins owner Dan Snyder, asking for a trade without a long-term contract in place, league and team sources told ESPN's Chris Mortensen. 

Snyder told Cousins that he should not anticipate a trade, sources said, and the quarterback is prevented from negotiating with teams under the exclusive franchise tag that was placed upon him on Feb. 28.

First report that Kirk Cousins really does want a trade, has spoken to Snyder about it. Very bad news for Redskins.

This blog will follow Cousins if he's traded. NFL should be thought about as a QBs league, first and last. Fans think in terms of teams doing battle, but it's more useful to look at it as dueling quarterbacks. I have no interest in writing about the Skins with a backup QB like Colt McCoy, or a first-year starter who, like most of them, will turn out to be below average.

If KC is traded to San Francisco, I will follow SF.

I'm hoping at least we get one more year with KC in Washington, mainly for investment purposes.

Liz Clarke Explains the Snyder Allen Feud

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/football-insider/wp/2017/03/08/redskins-gm-scot-mccloughan-has-no-role-in-current-free-agency-decision-making/?utm_term=.193091c70817#comments

This piece attempts to explain the motives behind the maneuvers. Apparently McCloughan and Allen really are at odds, for various reasons. Upshot is that McC is probably gone soon.

Allen Backs Statements with Behavior

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/dc-sports-bog/wp/2017/03/08/good-thing-the-redskins-ended-all-that-kirk-cousins-trade-talk-with-the-exclusive-tag/?utm_term=.653273c051d8

The reason we did the exclusive is we’re tired of all the nonsense that we’re thinking of trading [Cousins], or someone wants a trade. No. He’s going to be our quarterback, and we have to work out the agreement for the long term.”

That's Allen. Saying now what he said weeks ago. Since the first statements, Kirk Cousins has been tagged. So Allen's behavior backs up his words. It makes it marginally more believable that the Skins do want to sign Cousins long term. But Cousins has the leverage, as all media now observe, and he has to agree. Other teams will be happy to pay him lots of money, not just the Skins.

As I've said before (see Predictions label), I think Cousins will eventually sign for closer to 30m a year than 25, and he'll end up a bargain at that price. Truly it doesn't matter that much.

Meanwhile, in other Redskins news, Vernon Davis has reupped, for three years. That's good. He can block and catch, and has a calm head. Pierre Garcon has left. That will hurt some. The bigger hurt will be if DeSean Jackson departs, which appears likely.

In any case, the 2017 Redskins will feature a solid OL coach, a solid OL, a proven QB entering his prime, and several receivers who have already proven themselves (Davis, Crowder, Reed) and others who are likely to develop into good receivers.

Things are ok, the media are simply blowing air as they're paid to do, makes no nevermind, really.

Are the Redskins a Mess?

You ever had a suspicious girlfriend? Where if you dont respond to her question immediately turns her fear into fact and conducts a whole conversation with herself based on a false premise? That's kind of like what media reporting in the off-season amounts to. There may not be any information, there may not be any answers, but the media still have to produce copy. 

What we do know right now, as of March 7, is that the Redskins have the essentials in place for the coming year. They have a solid, established, well above average QB, and they have a solid, established coach. Both are on the rise, in terms of their learning curve. As an objective matter, good things are likely to happen for the Skins in 2017 - even better things than they have experienced in the last two years, which saw them essentially achieve the playoff qualification level of general competence. 

We don't know who they will be, but the Skins will have good people to receive passes. They will have a better DL coach. They will probably get a decent healthy player back in Galette. They will probably pick up at least one new decent player on defense via the draft or free agency. 

Overall, despite all the unanswered questions, the Redskins are in pretty good shape. Enjoy the hype if that's your taste, but there's no reason to believe it. The Skins....are good. 

Redskins Extend Gruden; Cousins Having Baby

Extending Gruden is a good idea. He's set, ready to go, can build on years of success. Same with Kirk Cousins. Family life is nailed down, ready to play hard for - some team. We will see if all the hot air about trades amounts to anything or the Redskins are able to work out a long-term deal, which would be better for both parties.

"Isn't Necessarily Motivated by the Same Things"

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/18807650/agent-kirk-cousins-says-exclusive-franchise-tag-washington-redskins-positive

"The last thing I want as Kirk's partner in this [is] for him to go to work mad at his employer. At the end of the day, his employer is still paying him well," McCartney said. "Kirk isn't necessarily motivated by the same things many other players are, so I want him to enjoy work. And I take that very seriously, and I think Eric certainly takes that seriously from the club perspective."

Statement from Cousins' agent. Interesting. What would Cousins take differently? It is not clear.

What's Going to Happen

Predictions (2017-03-02):

- Kirk Cousins' stats will drop slightly in 2017
- Kirk Cousins will play better in 2017 than in 2015 and 2016
- Redskins will go farther in playoffs than 2015 and 2016

The upshot will be that Kirk Cousins will hold out for a contract averaging closer to 30 million a year than 25 million, and that if the Skins dont meet these expectations, he will leave, because someone else will.

Liz Clarke Nails the Nonessential Reasons Skins Snub Cousins

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/football-insider/wp/2017/03/01/the-one-area-where-the-redskins-badly-miscalculated-kirk-cousins/?utm_term=.d44ecd6e6bfd#comments

Good Liz Clarke article.

She nails it - Cousins believes in himself because he puts in the work. He, at least, can see clearly his market value. He won't take less. Why should he? The Skins have gone out of their way to support inferior black QBs while he waited offstage. Objectively the Redskins delayed, hence damaged, his development. Then when he succeeded, they tried to underpay him. He has done nothing but say The Right Thing (TM) in public. He really has little reason to feel loyalty to Washington, apart from any coaches who helped him.

Clarke gets the Kirk side of the analysis correct. But she leaves out the most important factor: the Redskins owner is a jew. And jews hate whites. It's called loxism. It's why the media are so relentlessly anti-Trump and anti-white. Every day, every page. Snyder's attitude is part of that same attitude found throughout the elite, which is dominated by jews. Jew Snyder wants a flashy black QB Of The Future (TM). Not a squeaky clean cornball non-brother. Why should he sign Boring Vanillaman for a half decade when a fresh Dak Prescott might pop up tomorrow morning? This,attitude on the part of owner jew Snyder, ultimately, is what is behind the unwillingness to sign Cousins to a long-term deal. That signing still might happen, of course. But even if it does, it will not be Snyder's preference, it will be something he accepts only with reluctance.

You would think the executive in Snyder would notice what Clarke emphasizes - that Cousins is all about invisible work. Working hard, being careful - preparing to succeed. But he doesn't. Because Cousins is White, and to jews, that's a sin. The very last thing any jew wants to do is pay a hundred million dollars to a bible-believing christian whiteskin. If Cousins ends up with another team after this year, keep reading the media. Eventually what I assert here will come out in the middle of some analytical article. Sources will say or hint something that's a 1% reduction of what I'm saying here. You might have to read between the lines, but eventually one of the inside reporters will admit, never calling it by its true name (hatred/bigotry), that Synder simply didn't want Cousins' type playing QB for his team.

The good news here is our investment is now in play: betting the Skins very hard on the Over for their season wins, at whichever number we prefer, based on our tolerance for risk.

Investment Opportunity: Trump to be President on 1-1-18

Now trading at -650. 650 to win 100. You win if Trump is president on Jan 1, 2018. Why wouldn't be? It's a pipe dream of the left he'll be impeached or driven out some other way. This is an absurdly low price.

What It Comes Down To Is Whether You Believe Allen

Hot air is expended; what it comes down to is whether you believe Allen when he said Kirk Cousins is their QB. He's the only one in position to know, and to deal, who has commented.

Beneath the Hype, Skins Serious Re Cousins?

http://was.247sports.com/Bolt/Jason-La-Canfora-flips-script-on-Kirk-Cousins-reports-51387230

Now the media are flipping and saying Redskins will franchise Cousins, then try seriously to sign him to long term deal. This would be great. Allen has said KC is their long-term QB. Let's hope that's true.

Kirk Cousins: Just Close the Book on Him After Two Seasons, Urge the Dim

“Kirk Cousins is actually the more viable option, because Kirk Cousins will sit in the pocket and find his guy and read a defense and know pre-snap where he’s going to go with the ball, and if something breaks down, then he finds his checkdown back.'  

That's Jordan Rodgers. It's the description of what a QB is supposed to do. A notably high percentage of "QBs of the future" is not able to do it. And QBOTF = black. Another euphemism is "running QB." Whenever you see "inability to read defenses," you're basically seeing an extended term for dumb. By this theory, the blacks who succeed at QB will be more like the White QBs who succeed. Russell Wilson, for example. Very smart, very cautious. Even Jameis Winston fits this model. Cam Newton does not. Plenty of running QBs have a good year, or a good stretch, but then falter. Whereas the skills a QB like Cousins has do not wither with time, like fresh legs, they grow stronger, at least for a decade. The game "slows down" as they inevitably say. For the running QB, it's his legs that slow down, for the traditional QB, it's the game that slows down, with time and experience.

Again, we can't help but notice how the critics of Cousins, while correct in analyzing what he did in his first two seasons, fail to consider that he might do better as he gains more experience. Few of them seem to realize that the odds are better than not Cousins has not fully developed. But even if he has, he has broken records two seasons in a row. Do you not think he is capable of what Matt Ryan did in 2016? Instead, after a mere two seasons, one commenting reader says Skins don't want to be Cincinnati. When you remember how much official-media support RGIII got for his comeback(s), you can only shake your head. KC doesn't need to come back. And there's no reason to think he can't develop further.

No One Knows But the Daily Bugle Blows

Off season is time for stupid reporting. No one has any actual facts, but they still have space to fill. So they speculate. What is more useless than typing about who a team might draft? Or what they should pay a free agent?

Through all the clouds of ink, the squid of NOBODY HAS ANY ACTUAL FACTS gets away and forgotten.

Soon enough we will know. But for now we do not. Let's keep that fact forefront in our minds.

Daniel Snyder, Loxist

Daniel Snyder has come in for heaps of abuse during his tenure as owner of the Washington Redskins. But not for the right reason.

Snyder has been attacked for everything under the sun, but all those attacks have been aimed at him for being an old white guy (he is not, he is a jew) and for being racist. Racism is a bogus concept, so attacks based on it aren't legitimate. Snyder is criticized for not changing the name of his team because jewish antiwhite leftists don't like it. So what? Polls were taken, and they showed Indians themselves don't care. But of course the jews called liberals are the only authoritative voice for all groups at all times.

What deserves discussion is the racial roots of Snyder's jewish antipathy toward whites in general. This is absolutely universal among jews, and it explains most of the commentary and analysis you see. It's the dog that didn't bark in the why wont the Skins resign Cousins debate. Because jews own the media, they create the illusion that jews are victims. In fact, jews are never victims and always aggressors. What is the whole "QB of the future" scam-concept they created but a pseudo-analytical attempt to smuggle in their politics, which call for blacks replacing whites at every position on the field. Just as they do in broader society with the scam concepts of "diversity" and "multiculturalism" and open borders immigration.

"QB of the future" is the sports equivalent of "diversity." The problem is that just like in street society, diversity is a horrible weakness and the QB of the future can't get the job done. But the jew will keep on lying and trying.

This is the hidden grammar of the Cousins debate. You will never see the true reason the Skins' owner is slow to sign Cousins because it is de facto illegal in the controlled media to mention the incredible jewish bias against whites. It's called loxism, and it is the hatred that drives modern American media and politics - and sports media and ownership too.

Loxism Drives Refusal to Pay Cousins

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/redskins/kirk-cousins-is-going-to-make-the-redskins-pay-no-matter-where-he-ends-up/2017/02/23/ceb2bf22-f9ce-11e6-9845-576c69081518_story.html?utm_term=.b9d048b03953

Lots of fractured wind discussing why the Redskins are footdragging on Kirk Cousins. The explanation is simple: the owner is a jew, and jews don't like whites. They will always prefer to pay a black rather than a white, even if it costs them money and wins. This is why the skins leaped to overpay Haynesworth and Norman, while they won't even give Cousins the market rate. Having seen what black Prescott did in Dallas in his first year, the owner Synder will be hoping he can do the same.

The fact there is discrimination against whites even at the QB position is hidden from most people. They believe what they hear: blacks have this athleticism and higher ceilings that whites do. It's not true, but people believe it. Most professional sports teams in the big four are owned by jews. They all have the same biases. The big media are owned by jews too. Same type, same prejudices. You will never hear about a jew being prejudiced, except sometimes against blacks. And in that case, as with former Clippers owner, you will never hear that the owner is a jew; he will inevitably be described as an old white man. So the 'racism' charge will be levied against the white account. Jews are white when they do bad, and jews when they do good. This is deception, and it's deliberate.

Someone responds that, no, Snyder likes christian Gibbs. No, he doesn't. Jews absolutely loathe conservative evangelicals. Even though these fundamentalists are their biggest supporters, thanks to their dispensationalist views on Israel. Snyder has to pretend to love Gibbs because the guy won a bunch of Super Bowls. It would be intolerable to the people paying for tickets if Snyder did anything but show Gibbs respect. But like him - heck no. If you think that, you don't understand how jews work.

They didn't give Cousins the chance to win the job on the field when he was drafted; then, after the jew owner's preferred choice failed, they watched as the superior white talent succeeded. And then the jew owner dragged his foot on paying the man his deserved and earned money. Why the heck would Cousins want to do anything other than get free of this situation and collect $100 million plus with a team that can see what he's worth?

Cousins still has plenty to prove. That's not the issue. But he has proved enough to justify a massive payday. The skins refuse him, without having any better options. There's a reason McCoy is a backup. He's a perfectly fine mediocre QB. He's not some kind of starter that's going to win most games. At best his ceiling is about two games over .500.

What reason is there to think we've seen the best of Cousins? He's only played two full  years. He has improved over those two years, immensely. And played a much more difficult schedule in the second year. The only reason the Skins haven't moved to sign him to a huge long-term contract is loxism, the jewish hatred of whites.

Kirk Cousins and 2017 Predictions

I predict:

Cousins will stay.
He will be franchise tagged.
The Redskins will make the playoffs.
They will win two games and lose in the conference championship.

Date of predictions; 2017-02-22.

Bizarre to Pay Norman, Balk at Cousins

It seems bizarre to balk at paying Cousins, the QB, 24M a year when you're paying a cornerback 20M.

Crowder Comes On

http://profootballspot.com/washington-redskins-2017-jamison-crowder-teams-best-wide-receiver/

Crowder has that squirty speed that's extremely difficult to cover. 

Zach Zenner Offseasons Not Getting Drunk, in Fights, Causing Social Havoc

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/sports/nfl/lions/2017/01/24/lions-zenner-back-hitting-medical-studies-zeal/96991894/

Meanwhile, offfield, things were coming together.

Kirk Cousins and Ben Roethlisberger

Ben Roethlisberger has won two Super Bowls. If you watched them, you might have noticed that he played horribly both times. I recall this very sharply because I lost a very large investment on propositions related to BR playing well in the second SB, thinking that he was jittery the first time and would perform at least to par in the second. The irony was that though he did below average again, his team ended up covering, in one of the two worst REOs (Ref-Engineered Outcomes) I've seen in decades of NFL viewing. (The other was the St. Louis Rams Super Bowl against the NE Patriots.)

The point for our purposes here, to restate, is that Ben Roethlisberger has two Super Bowl wins and he played worse than poorly in both of them. Do you seriously doubt Kirk Cousins is less capable than that? I don't.

There's also the fact that KC gets the ball out, doesn't get sacked. Doesn't take the terrible abuse Roethlisberger does physically. This is an underrated factor among reasons to keep Cousins. It shouldn't be.

KC is a more valuable QB today than Ben Roethlisberger, and will become only more so as the years go by. BR will decline and retire while KC continues to improve.

Move On?

Casserly says he doesn't consider Cousins a top-10 QB. He didn't sound real convinced. Sounded like he was very well aware this clip could come back to haunt him.

One way of thinking is if we can't make a long term deal this year, why franchise him? Since he won't be around next, cuz financial numbers. In that case, "move on." 

Move on...to what? Seriously - move on to what? There's nothing there. An old Tony Romo? How is that better than KC? You going to sign him long term? he's going to get less injury prone, demand less salary, be around in 2-3 years?

Move on translates into start another rebuilding projected based around a gaping hole at the most important position. How does that make any sense? Any drafted QB will take years to mature. That's the rule. Dak Prescott was the exception, but what all these people are forgetting is that now the league grasps his ability, has the video on him, can plot to stop him more effectively. He will not play as well in year two as in year one, you can bet on that. So which QB used or untested are the Skins going to bring in to do better than Cousins? There isn't one. To get rid of Cousins means to go backwards, no matter who they bring in. Even if you truly don't want to pay KC, it makes sense to tag him for this year for reduced-frictional reasons alone. 

If the Redskins were to get rid of Cousins, then the whole Allen-McCloughan project falls apart. Instead of having a great offense in place, they have a big hole in the center, and their weak defense with new coaches will be under much more pressure. 

At this point, one realizes a lot of people, even pros, truly have bought the hype that Cousins is a plug in, that his success is due to those around him more than himself. He promotes this view with his words, but that's him being a leader - distributing credit, not taking it for himself. It's the outsiders, the analysts, who should be saying that he is the #1 reason for the Redskins success. Because that is the fact. But they won't do this, because that would mean crediting a white rather than a bunch of blacks, and the media are jews or those paid by them, and they hate whites. That may mean open raw racial hatred, as the Washington Post jews exhibit toward the new president. Or it may mean begrudging a white Christian QB the full measure of respect his production deserves. This deliberately fostered or honestly held misconception about his true value appears to have the Skins on the verge of a very serious mistake.

I will repeat: it is absolutely insane to do anything but sign Cousins to a long-term (5-year) contract, and it will be seen so within days of their not doing it. You don't want to settle for KC? You can do better? Who? Where? Are you out of your mind? Yes. You are out of your mind, if you believe that.

Redskins 2017: 7th Toughest Schedule

http://www.redskins.com/news/article-1/Redskins-Face-Seventh-Hardest-Schedule-In-2017/df38495e-c7c5-4a2b-9dae-bded6a0d27cb

More a function of their being in a great division than anything, since Giants are at 8th spot and Cowboys at 10. The Eagles figure to be better, Dallas figures to be at least very good again. The Giants might go either way. It will be difficult for the Skins to do better than split their divisional games.

Kirk Cousins Throws a Very Catchable Ball

3. Kirk Cousins is Deadly Accurate
One thing that you might've noticed in the previous table is his 69.8% completion rate in 2015 ranks 11th in NFL history for a single season.  It was the second best completion percentage ever by a Washington passer behind only Sammy Baugh's 70.3% in 1945. http://www.hogshaven.com/2017/2/17/14635736/skins-stats-ten-reasons-kirk-cousins-is-worth-the-money

The reason for this is in good part that Cousins throws a very catchable ball. Contrast him with the QB of the Carolina Panthers, who throws blue darters. All we ever hear is that these great receivers are making Cousins better. I would accept that in the case of Reed. But Cousins' throws are not just accurate, they have that softness where the ball is taking a helpful arc as it passes the receiver. It's a subtle matter of a degree or two, but it's almost always in the receiver's favor, making the catch just a little easier to make. This is a large part of the reason for his high completion percentage: his marginal throws are easier to haul in than those of almost any other QB you care to name. It's not only an underrated aspect of his play, I have literally never heard anyone mention it, though it's clear to see visually when you watch his throws.

Snyder's Jewish Bigotry Explains Cousins Footdragging

http://www.hogshaven.com/2017/2/17/14635736/skins-stats-ten-reasons-kirk-cousins-is-worth-the-money

Cousins should be paid pretty much whatever he wants. The reason the Skins are dragging their feet is he's not black. And worse than that, he's a believing Christian. To jews like Dan Snyder, that's like a cross to a vampire. They hate whites. And they hate christians. And they really hate Christian whites. This is why Cousins was never given a chance to compete for the starting job when he was drafted - even though he was better than RGIII from day one. It's pure bigotry. It's already cost Cousins more than a year of devlopment. Snyder's loxism has objectively hurt his team. Of course, it's his decision to make, since he owns the team, but the media should be faulted for not pointing it out. Since they gleefully point to racial motives heading the other direction, even though the vast majority of these are imaginary. Well, this one is real.

There is no rational reason not to sign Cousins to a long-term contract, but there is an irrational one: Snyder's hatred of christian whites. It's just that no one in the controlled media dares to write about it.

Prediction

Prediction; If Kirk Cousins goes to San Francisco, the 49ers will have a better record than the Redskins over the next five years.

Prediction date: 2017-02-17.

Kirk Cousins: The Stats

http://www.hogshaven.com/2017/2/17/14635736/skins-stats-ten-reasons-kirk-cousins-is-worth-the-money

Stats indicating Kirk Cousins is a top QB.

Investment Opportunity: Kirk Cousins -200 to be Redskin Week 1 2017

Not available everywhere, or even many wheres, but if you can get this hop all over it: Kirk Cousins' team to be the Redskins, as of Week 1. -200 quoted from Covers. Easy 50% return. No way Skins let him  walk.

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2017/02/15/vegas-redskins-favored-destination-for-cousins-in-2017/

Astonishing There Is Any Debate Over Kirk Cousins

Even if they had to pay him $50 million a year, Cousins would be worth it. They have no better alternative, and he still likely has an upside he hasn't shown. If you're going to say he panicked in clutch, so did one of the two guys in the Super Bowl. The crowd blames Kyle Shanahan, but Matt Ryan is a mature adult - he decided to hold onto the ball and get sacked making FG impossible. And he's been a starting QB in league for nearly a decade. He's not truly any better than Cousins is now. And Cousins can easily give another ten years of quality play.

The Skins are also underrating Cousins' ability to stay healthy, as I keep repeating to no echo. That is not a small thing, it is a medium-sized thing.

If the Skins let Cousins go, the recriminations and crying will begin the next day, and rightly so. These people are brainwashed by media to underrate whites, and particularly white men in the mold of Cousins - personally careful, conscientious, Christian and frugal. All they ever hear is about the endless upside and high ceilings of these 'athletic' (read: black) QBs of the future. It is to laugh. The future QB will be the same as the past QB, an intelligent white man with a strong arm and great judgment. If he can run a bit, that's great. But if not, doesn't matter. Because any QB, no matter how slow, can run when he's open. See Tom Brady.

Conservative Policy Is Best Way to Go

The Skins have something. Their goal should be, first, to protect it. Only secondarily to improve it. Many improvements turn out not to be, after all.

What are the Redskins' assets?:

Players who can move ball and score points.
Great OL coach
GM who can ID true talent and manage money capably
Head coach who can scheme good plays.
Long snapping.
Punting and placekicking

These are their core assets. These should be protected and preserved.

The only things the Redskins should be loose and free with are their sub-mediocre players, since any replacements they get can't really get worse. I think. But even there, a certain number of these poor to average players might improve with experience - and they are already inside the system, know how it works. So even there, the bias should be to retain them unless a very likely superior alternative presents itself.

This is the correct mentality for the Skins to embrace: Protect what you have that before jumping after what you don't.

Proven Quality Players - Not Defense or Offense

If you cant buy top players at all positions, and if offense is defense and defense is offense, then you might as well pay top dollar for whatever proven quality you can find. Since change is so rapid in NFL, there's no such thing as being too deep at any position. This is the argument for paying Garcon and Jackson say 10m apiece. Why let first-rate talent go if it's proven and wants to stay? "Offense" and "defense" loom too large in people's eyes. Just look at it as talent. You're going to let two PROVEN talents, who support QB, have proven their compatibility with QB on the field, go because you need to get people on defense. You don't even know who those people are. You vaguely hope to buy a few and draft a few. But none of these will be PROVEN at the level the existing talent already is. It appears not more than 1-2 top defensive agents will even be available for purchase. If McCloughan's policy of getting the best talent available applies to draft, shouldnt it apply in-house as well? Because not just is the talent proven with the receivers, the compatibility is proven. There are at least two-three check marks already demonstrated by Garcon and Jackson, and there are at least two-three question marks for any defensive players they would buy or draft.

Again, the Skins are an offensive team. Not a defensive team. Don't fight it. Buy whatever talent is available, but keep the talent, the proven talent, you already have in house. That's the best way to look at it, but no one in the media even brings that option up, so sure are they that the skins must improve on defense. But they consider defense by itself when defense is best viewed as a term for a part of a functioning whole.

Redskins Defense Not as Far Away as It Seems

I don't know what will happen to Skins' defense in 2017. But it's not as bad as it appears. In 2016, many times the D would stop the team impressively for two plays in a row, then yield a ridiculous third down conversion. The Skins cannot improve their defense radically with a few moves; it will take more than that. Mainly, they need better coaching. Then they need better talent on the line. If they can somehow find one DL who can congest the center, that is probably the one single greatest thing they can do in the offseason to take the biggest jump forward in overall quality. The rest, I'm afraid, will take time, talent and development.

Best scenario for the defense: Norman calms down, continues superior play. Breeland rebounds to 2015 form. McCloughan buys a nosetackle and drafts a first-rate DL; gets another two DL picks who actually do develop under new coach Tomsula's tutelage. Galette returns and plays well. Finally, Cravens develops into a good whatever-he-is. If all these things happen, and Skins offense resembles teams of 2015 and 2016, the defense will be above league average.

The Skins don't need much. They are a playoff team right now. To be a Super Bowl winner, they must develop either an above average defense or take their offense to the highest possible level, with Cousins developing his winnership skills, so to speak, or a truly killer RB developing so that the skins' offense is close to unstoppable. Then even an average or slightly below average defense will suffice.

There are no teams out there great on both sides of the ball because the rules make it impossible to pay for top talent at all positions. So every team will be lopsided. The Skins are an offensive team. Their thing is moving the ball easily and scoring points. That's not going to change, nor should it. Rather, that ability should be protected and improved. And if the defense can chip in some help, so much the better. But don't kid yourself the Skins are going to develop a killer defense; no, the story of the next five  years will be what the Skins offense can do, assuming Cousins is resigned, as they'd be crazy not to. Really, all the Skins need to do is become average on defense. And all that requires is stopping some runs up the middle, and preventing opponents from converting low-percentage third downs. Very doable. It will be very interesting to see what sort of results new DL coach Jim Tomsula can produce.

Their Offense Is Their Defense

The Redskins should focus on preserving their core: their great OL coach, their good head coach, their very good QB, their first-rate TE Reed, their first-rate WR, Their blossoming pick Crowder. Their source of indefinable strength, Garcon, the first to affirm the new QB when things could have gone another way.

I do believe Cousins and Gruden can and will improve in coming years. Same for Crowder. The OL is in good shape, and Scherff and Moses are still in the waxing phase. Perhaps the left guard can be upgraded. The necessary refinements here are: Gruden must learn clock management. Cousins must learn to make better decisions re running the ball, and focus on winning games not producing stats. Less fear, more leadership, more vocal, more inspiring. 

The running game will have to be taken as it comes. It's clear Kelley can do something. He's not the best. But if he can avoid fumbling, he's good enough. Against most teams he can gain yardage on most carries. 

The downside of conventions is they trap us into one way of looking at things when we need to continually see them from as many different angles as possible so we don't miss anything. In grabbing for better defense, the Redskins might too lightly esteem the players they do have. It's convention to divide teams into offense and defense, and with obvious reason, but the reality is that the best defense any team can have is keeping its own offense on the field. And the best offense has the best players. So you don't just hurt the offense when you let a DeSean Jackson go, you hurt the defense. So if you ignore the conventional view and just look at the quality of the player, no matter his specific position, then you reach a very different way of looking at things. For every TD pass or deep completion that departs with Jackson, think about what you give up. When he scores or causes a FG to be scored, he has created a need to produce an entire successful drive for the opposition. That's not defense - that's better than defense. 

The point of football is not to keep the other guy from scoring but to keep him from having the ball until you can put at least 21 points between him and yourself (35 if your QB is named Ryan). The better your offense, the less your defense is on the field, the more rested it is, the lower the quality of players it can get by with. This is not the only way to look at things, but it is a serious way of regarding them given where the talent exists on the current roster. In giving up any of the great players up for agency the Redskins risk losing more than is apparent. 

The Redskins defense is not going to be great in 2017. It is possible they will be above average, but they will not be great. The law of averages, the wheel of Fortuna, will probably swing back their way some, and that will be enough to get them toward average, in conjunction with the offense being as good as before, or close to it. Some of the secondary players may develop some over last year. Perhaps a free agent can be brought in. Perhaps a good DL can be drafted. But these things won't cohere overnight. The offense is already in place. All moves should be made with the consideration of protecting this goose that lays the golden eggs. In my view, this translates into: the Skins are well positioned capwise. They have money. They should spend that money on retaining their great catchers, all of them if they can. Because the truth is that it will be easier for them, if they let those guys go, to go downhill on offense than to improve the defense. 

I believe what Jackson says, that the Skins are very close to being an elite team. Jackson has been more valuable than Josh Norman, who refuses to refrain from drawing selfish personal foul penalties. Jackson is like T.Y. Hilton in that he easily runs by people. It's easy to underestimate how valuable that is, and the Skins risk learning a hard lesson if they let him go. The right thing to do is retain both Jackson and Garcon -- and to pay Kirk Cousins top dollar so he's a Redskin through his most productive years. All the main players have come out in support of Cousins getting paid, and they have all said they see a bright future for the team if it continues to develop along the lines of the last two years. That's how I see it myself. It's very easy to say that X's proven ability can be supplied by Y, but you just don't know that for sure. That's precisely the glibness you repent in leisure when, say, Doctson continues to be injured, or isn't actually that good, or one of the other mainstays falls off. Anytime you give up known, proven entities such as Garcon or Jackson, who are not declining, no matter their numerical age, you run a risk. There's no need to do that given the Skins have the money to pay them both. And they both want to be Redskins and have said as much.

Draft and Divorce

I think it was Joan Didion who described divorce as "different faces, same problems." If you don't understand how to construct and respectively and collectively train the positions and relationships of a defense, the personnel don't matter. Do the Redskins have coaches who know these things? It's not clear to me that they do. Contrast with Jay Gruden and the offensive coaches, most notably Callahan, who clearly do understand how to construct and train a line, scheme passing plays, etc.

It's easy to see that the Redskins lack talent on defense, but that begins with coaching talent. The part that isn't talked about much because it's not as visible. Mediocre players well coached add up to more than the sum of their parts. That's what New England's history under Belichick teaches. By contrast, buying great talent fails more often than it succeeds. The Redskins have numerous examples from their own experience to prove this. Who on the Redskins understands how defense is supposed to be played? Is Jim Tomsula the DL's Bill Callahan equivalent?

This is why the opinion that is the exact opposite of what everybody thinks is probably correct: that the Redskins should focus on keeping their best offensive players, and keeping their offense as strong as possible. Because the Redskins already have a good defense. It's called their offense. They have a coach and players who understand how to move the ball, how to keep the ball, and how to score lots of points. That's the best defense they have for them right now and for the foreseeable future. Until they bring in someone who actually understands how direct defense actually works, the Redskins' best defensive players are Kirk Cousins and a tie between Jordan Reed and Bill Callahan.

ESPN Embraces Leftism, Viewers Embrace Egress

http://www.outkickthecoverage.com/espn-profit-plummets-as-network-turns-left-020817


There is a school of media criticism - dishonest, fake and dull - that claims the way to understand the mass media is that it's in the consolidated control of giant corporations bent on maximizing profits above all other considerations. The advocates of this bogus theory can never explain, nor do they even attempt to explain, how, if that is the case, a company like ESPN can embrace leftist politics that piss off the majority of their viewers. It's not just ESPN. It's all those giant corporations. Netflix, with its race-baiting "Dear White People." It's Hollywood refusing to finance one of its most popular actors' movie about a man who is hero to literally a billion people.

The correct way to understand and predict what the media will do is to understand that the mass media are owned, operated and controlled by jews, and they put their political agenda - always anti-white - ahead of profits. They will never admit what they're up to, of course. But it's implicit in all their behavior. Just as they control the media, the jews control media criticism. So that they and their peculiar, invariably antiwhite racial motives are never on the table. Never allowed into that debate they're so keen to embrace. It never occurs to the goyish sapsuckers that a menu of Media-Approved-Positions doesn't necessarily include the true and correct ones. That, after all, is why the liars and schemers control things, and the goy retards go to Buffalo Wild Wings and get drunk.

Reed Endorses Cousins Strongly

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/dc-sports-bog/wp/2017/02/13/jordan-reed-on-redskins-offseason-first-of-all-we-gotta-bring-kirk-back/?utm_term=.a74fbb142685

Redskins must bring Cousins back and retain as many of their receivers as they can. Both Jackson and Garcon if possible. It will be easier for the Skins to maintain their offensive level than improve their defensive level. Some of the modest improvement in defense, I predict, will come from the law of averages and an extra year of experience. Little will come from draft or free agency.

A Different Way to Look at It

Everyone says the Redskins need defense. Undeniable.

But if they can't get a great nose tackle or other lineman, perhaps they should go all out to resign their offense skill, and just hope they can outscore everyone. The chances are, just by law of averages, the Skins defense will play somewhat better in 2017. It can't play a lot worse. Norman and Cravens will have a year of experience with the Skins. Galette will be back. The skins defense is not as far away from being good as it might seem. If Breeland plays better, Galette returns, and Cravens improves due to experience, the defense could play ten percent better. That makes the Skins at least a ten-win team, given they played three games under their true record, as I figure it.

There's always an argument for simply taking the best player available. That's been McCloughan's philosophy, no reason to stop now. If you're always ahead and never stopped on third down, you don't need a defense.

Loverro: if bad outside, worse in

Lots of rumors and gossip about Redskins. It's all stupid. No one cares unless they're into the unpaid secretarial work called fantasy football.

Thom Loverro is or was Washington Times sportswriter. He has been pretty negative on the Skins. He says one of his rules, applied here to skins' head office, is if things look bad from outside, they're worse inside.

Who knows. Claims Allen is pissed that McLoughan gets credit and he doesn't. Who knows.

All this will blow away if they resign Cousins. That's job the first. Job the second is getting a defensive line. We should know in about eight weeks at the latest whether that has been accomplished.

Now It's Michigan State

http://deadspin.com/three-michigan-state-players-suspended-while-police-inv-1792197378

Michigan State University Police is investigating allegations of sexual assault against three MSU student-athletes.

Like I said, this stuff is going on at every D-1 school, in greater or lesser degree. Wherever blacks congregate, the same crimes are found.

Just as wherever blacks have political power and demographic majority, the school district begins falsifying test scores, the cops begin downgrading or not recording crimes, the budget begins to head toward the red.

Blacks are not capable of self control or self government. That's the truth. It's just that it can't be spoken over the public airwaves because we live in a democracy.

Student Loans: 1.26 Trillion; Default Rate Over 11 Percent

44 million Americans have at least some student loan debt for a total of 1.26 trillion dollars. The overall delinquency rate for these loans is 11.1 percent.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/student-loans-arent-getting-paid-off/

Redskins 61/1

Redskins are 60/1 to win 2017 Super Bowl as of 9 February. No team totals available yet.

This Blog...Not Just Sports

But also the ultimate bloodsports - politics + women. Life.

Our focus will be - think of concentric circles of increasing circumference:

Kirk Cousins
Redskins
NFL
Sports
Men
Politics
Life

MGTOW: Thoughts for Men

Lots to learn from MGTOW guys. Getting  married is legally dangerous for men - financially and emotionally. Watch some of this guy's videos if you're considering it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEQO74FzNvE

Here's an especially important video, about irrevocable contract trusts. Only you will protect your assets. Your ex will take them, and the courts will back her. You must know that before you enter a relationship.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IazS50SQpjk

Kirk Cousins on Kyle Shanahan

Kirk Cousins on Kyle Shanahan Oh, I’ve always been a big fan of Kyle’s. I’ve always spoken very highly of him from the day I was picked. And he called me right after the draft and just preached belief in me and encouragement and has coached me hard in all my years playing for him. I loved his system right away and saw it successfully run with Robert Griffin, I’ve now seen it successfully run with Matt Ryan. And I just believe Kyle adapts his scheme to the players he has. He’s just an offensive genius. He understands Xs and Os very well. He watches film, he just doesn’t read press clippings or make decisions based on hype. He watches the tape and his decisions over time have proven to be right. I’m a big fan of his. I always will be. Even though he’s been on other teams I’ve always rooted for him and wanted to see him succeed.

Cousins Shoves Ref in Charity Game

http://nypost.com/2017/02/06/furious-kirk-cousins-pushes-ref-at-charity-football-game/

“I’m the official that Cousins shoved. He was fired up because he was losing and running out of time,” he said. “Then the other team knocked the ball away while I was trying to set it for play. He wanted me to flag him for swatting it, but what he doesn’t know is that we were enforcing another penalty and it was going to give him another down. He never apologized or even showed any kind of regret. That’s ok though… everyone else gets to see how he is.”

This is the first dumb public thing I've seen Cousins do.

It gives insight into him. It re-raises a red flag first raised late in 2016 season. Going into the last game. When the Redskins needed to beat the Giants to make the playoffs.

I don't have the quotation at hand, but the gist was that this game, if they lost, was no more significant than any other if they didn't make it. He wasn't preparing any differently.

I'm not quite accurate in these quotes but they suggested ever so subtly that Cousins was scared. And preparing himself a very subtle excuse should his team come up short. And it did. And his bad decision, resulting in a bad throw, was one big reason why.

Now he shoves a ref at a charity game?

The red flag here is that Cousins, knowing he can't come up big, treats smaller stuff as just as important as bigger stuff. Bullies like to beat up on the weak. It is always a bad sign for QB when they only play well against lousy teams. When they only score TDs and rack up stats against lousy opponents or after the game's outcome has already been decided.

Cousins should be laughing and having fun, not shoving a ref. It's one thing to chase down a player in the Pro Bowl; this is something different. Different and not good.

The future will show whether these red flags do signal a character weakness, or they are outliers and mistakes, of no deep significance.

Cousins Describes Himself and How He Needs to Evolve

I need to be more of that guy. I think from the day I entered the league, I’ve tried to be a little more buttoned down, a little more careful to not stick my foot in my mouth, and I think I need to let myself come out. The guy that the teammates see at practice and at OTAs, the guy that the teammates see in the locker room, from behind closed doors. I think people need to see that, like you said, from the kickoff. As I get a little more experienced in this league, I think it will come naturally, but I think I need to make a more concerted effort to make that happen. I think if I do, I think it will help.

Correct.

In an honest moment, Cousins said he believes he can be a better leader with a multi-year contract. 

That is the benefit to the long-term deal. It’s okay, I’m the guy. I’ve got full freedom to lead, full freedom to just be the guy, to make this mine, and to get that permission, if you will. That’s where I think the leash comes off and you’re able to fully go, and I’m excited for that day to come, whether it comes this year or down the road. I can’t wait.

Which is what I said the other day. 

Adult Sports Fans - Pathetic Frontrunners

If sports moves you deeply, and you're a grown adult, there's something wrong with you. That energy should be invested in something heavier. Not ersatz butter of pro football or basketball.

Americans have poor character, if you consider front-running a flaw. I do. Look around: why do you think there are so many Pittsburgh and Green Bay fans? How many people do you know who are from Pittsburgh or ever lived there? Green Bay? Yet they have fans all over the country. For only one reason: they're winning. The lower the quality of the man, the greater his desire to associate with "winners" - whether men or teams or corporate brands.

A good example can be found at Plenty of Fish, the free dating site. If you search area codes in the middle of the country, you will find that a few years ago, loads of the profiles had pictures of themselves in St. Louis Cardinals gear. Attending games, wearing hats, tshirts, etc. Then the Kansas City Royals got hot. Won it all one year. All of a sudden pretty much all these same people were now wearing KC Royals clothes. Pure front-running. Pure trendiness and low character. I believe most Americans are like this in 2017. Perhaps most always were. Loyalty is rare.

Kirk Cousins: The Question

The interesting question is not whether Kirk Cousins signs with the Redskins, the question is whether Kirk Cousins is another Matt Ryan - a guy who passes for stats but lacks the certain mental something it takes to win the biggest games.

I am comfortable drawing the "can't" conclusion for Ryan, Stafford, Dalton and Palmer. I suspect Kirk Cousins is a "can." Suspect it. Want it to be true. But he has not proven it.

Super Bowl Outcome 2017: Win for Trump, Win for Whites

The forces in AmeriKwa that would make it the Land of No Second Opinion are glum and gurning over the Patriots' come from behind victory in Super Bowl 71. Brady and Belichick are friends with President Trump. Whom they hate. So by proxy they must hate B&B too. It gets tiresome to normal Americans, to real Americans, two redundancies for just plain Americans. But that's ideological thinking for you. Category transcends all, and everything is politics.

Like the dumbasses too many of them are, they gloated it up on twitter when NE fell into a hole. Only meant they'd need a refill for their tear ducts when their outcome of choice crashed and burned. No one can help but see a parallel to the 2016 election.

It is nice, it is.

Blaming Kyle Shanahan Not Ryan Is Wrong

http://deadspin.com/all-the-falcons-had-to-do-was-not-lose-23-yards-1792028183

They're right back to bashing Kyle Shanahan. Only thing he's guilty of, and Quinn too, is not knowing the nature of his QB enough to pre-route around his defects. #1 of which is that he cannot handle serious pressure. So when they say a handoff should have been called, they are correct, but not for the reason they think. There's nothing wrong with a pass, the problem is that exactly what happened is likely to happen - Ryan has failed in this situation before. Ryan has never won a big game until the conference championship against GB, and that was a matter of the Packers running out of gas.

Matt Ryan is on a list of above-average QBs who always fail in the clutch. Along with:

Andy Dalton
Carson Palmer
Matt Stafford

Those guys never have or will win a serious game, they don't have it between their ears.

Not Alex Smith. He's just not good enough. More a physical thing. The other guys have the tools, south of their hatstand, anyway.

Race Bowl 2017

[Will update this post with remarks]

'Route runners.' Not great athletes.

Would be nice to hear some speculation on how many thousands of Chris Hogan-physical-equivalents there must be. Given demographics. Why aren't they in the league? If they don't exist, then that means Hogan is . . . a great athlete. You know: like the blacks. With their racial 'athleticism,' a code term for blacks.

Start of 2q. I expect NE to win because Ryan is not mentally as strong as Brady. Also, Brady + white-equivalent (jew) Edelman + white Hogan + white Amendola > black receivers + Ryan. I say this as NE turns ball over to Atlanta.

Black guy Blount fumbles, blunting a good drive underway based on passes from Brady to white receivers.

NOTE: mitchell did not catch the ball to pick up first down, mid-4q. at 12-28 score, series after ryan turnover. they moved along super quick. started to show replay then cut it.

Race Bowl Results: have to give this one to blacks. white receivers dropped passes. white QB brady was off in his throws, missed one wide open receiver. other QB failed to feel pressure, yielded crucial later fumble. blacks with less experience played better, at least at receiver position. white kicker missed extra point.

Ryan fumbles under pressure. Ryan takes sack to get them out of FG range. Weak mind.

CONCLUSION: ryan lost this game. as i thought, the game turned on his weak-mindedness. he caused a loss out of a nearly unwinnable situation for the opponent. it was a lucky NE win, but ryan has blown games like this before. he bailed seattle out of a similar well in atlanta a couple years ago by his terrible throws and decisions. no one really played great in this game. more games are lost than won, Super bowl 51 was a typical example.

MEDIA: they're blowing Brady as usual, but he played poorly most of the game. give him credit for taking advantage of his opportunities, which were gifted to him quite unnecessarily by the opponent after his not-so-fresh play had put his team in a well it couldnt get out of.

RACIAL WRAP-UP: i'm still giving this to blacks. the black defense of Atlanta played well most of the game. they didnt lose it. ryan lost it. white receivers for NE came on late. whites should be held to higher standards than blacks. NE played worse than it should have most of the game.

NOTE: that incredible pass from ryan to jones was basically a bad decision that worked out perfectly. the pass was right where it had to be, and jones made a fantastic play. i would be  unfair to ryan if he often made such passes, but what he did was make a bad decision that unexpectedly worked out. that pass is intercepted far more often than completed. so that pass, more precisely the decision to make it, was in line with his other bad plays. notice no one will give this opinion - that that pass was actually a bad decision on his part. nor will enough blame go to ryan. but he is the true reason his team lost and the patriots won.

"Daytona Day"

All the masses care about is bread and circuses. As time goes by, new sports are created, old ones are made over, individual events are picked out and polished. Hey. Let's make Daytona Day a 'thing.' How do make a thing a thing? By pretending it already is a thing. Get some of the class leaders to make a commercial. Everybody copies the cool kids.

Japanese Know What's Up

Enjoy these videos while you wait for the Superest of Bowls.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRFksLAasTc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaLQcJ3q3Hc

Defining Cuckservative

https://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=2152307&postcount=19

In short, it's someone who betrays his race for money. To advance his personal interests, he accepts money to advocate politics that destroy his own race and nation.

Movies Worth Watching: Grizzly Man (2005)

Werner Herzog's film I had only seen in part, so I watched it all the other day. It's very good. The pacing is excellent. It doesn't linger annoyingly the way this type of film often does. It's not overwritten either. I like the way Herzog doesn't bs around but openly states his opinion a few times. Says overtly but unemotionally that he disagrees with Treadwell's views.

Treadwell was very White. A mix of bravery, stupidity, gullibility, persistence, lunacy and imagination. Treadwell overcame losing the part of Woody on Cheers. He overcame upended bottle syndrome. Bears saved him. Then ate him. But he knew that was the price of giving his life meaning. That's his paradox. "Each man is killed by the things he loves," Treadwell might have said, turning Wilde.

I will point up other movies worth seeing, and that is the only rating system worth a damn.

Three Drug Night for Oswalt-Frau McNamara

Murgatroyd putz Patton Oswalt's wife took three drugs just to stand the sight of his lumpy face. But the combined forces of Xanax, Adderall and Fentanyl were not enough.

http://www.cinemablend.com/pop/1621279/patton-oswalt-reveals-wifes-cause-of-death

Rape Culture Is Ape Culture: Of Beckys and Bucks at Brileses' Baylor

“Do you like white women? Because we have a lot of them at Baylor and they love football players.”

https://theringer.com/baylor-bears-football-program-art-briles-court-filing-2fc2103c5bb5#.9lmlujaq9

The Brileses use white women to get ahead in their career. White girls are trained to worship blacks, not just as athletes. Jews control the media, and portray blacks as more athletic than whites in the above ground sportsmedia. Below ground, they portray blacks as having bigger cocks. None of this is true. But it all pushes the same way: blacks are manlier than whites. More desirable.

Whites are bland, boring and weak. Yet at the same time, they're all budding Hitlers. It makes no sense logically, nor need it. All that matters is that every single thing said against whites, particularly white men, is negative. And blacks turn from being huge-cocked natural athletes and manly studs...to being passive victims of eternal racism, the shame that never goes away. The attitude that explains all their failures.

It's all jews abusing whites to render their society pliable for digestion. The (((media))) are equivalent to the fluid in a spider bite, which breaks down the meat for easier digestion.

When the various scandals come to light, the politicizing simply takes another angle. Rather than explain it as I have above, they will take the feminist line that there is a "rape culture." But actually there's an ape culture - whites don't gang-rape women 10 at a time. Only blacks do that. And it doesn't have to be women. This week there was a story about five black "men" raping a 10-year-old boy in South Africa.

A sane society does not give blacks or jews rights, it either exterminates them or keeps them locked away on reservations. Otherwise, the kind of junk that happens at Baylor - which is only a particularly egregious example of what goes on at virtually all Division I schools - is inevitable.

White men are encouraged to waste the off hours they aren't working like dogs to support single mothers and EBT coloreds or foreign wars for Israel watching black-dominated sports. They're encouraged to view the professional sports coloreds as heroes. This Baylor story is the underbelly of that obscene foolishness.

Whites should decide to be more than slaves, more than spectators, more than consumers. That means turning off the tv and cashiering the jews feeding them that Semitically Correct pabulum.

Media 101: (((They))) Lie & Smear in Lockstep

Media primer. Understanding how they work. That's what this blog is about. Part of its mission, anyway.

The (((media))) move in lockstep. They take their cues from the top. That means the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Associated Press.

It doesn't matter who invents it, just that all work in concert to promote it. What is it? It's an epithet for smearing some man or group opposed to The Agenda. Examples will occur to you easily - racist, homophobe, misogynist.

It's not just nouns. It's adjectives too. If a Bad Man does something, he obviously does it for Bad Reasons. So bad adjectives and adverbs should be applied to his actions.

A month back it was "dark." Yesterday it was "chaos" or "chaotic." Can you guess who these terms were applied to?

We have a free press, sort of, legally, in the USA, but all the common media use the same terms, arguments and frames. Isn't that interesting?

Just look around, and see how when you see some new adjective applied to Trump - it's used across the board. This is 'best practice' among the media. We'll see what new ones they think up as the Trump administration proceeds.

It works in reverse too. Not just in politics, but anywhere. In sports. So that blacks are always possessors of 'athleticism.' Whereas whites presumably do not. They get by on hustle and grit.

But really...teach yourself about media control by scanning the headlines at Google News and Yahoo daily for a few weeks. You will notice not just that any article that can take a position is leftist and Trump-hostile or -critical. And you will notice the subtler point that the exact same adjective will be used by different sources on the same day. All these "free" and independent sources are promoting the same agenda, the same line, in the exact same terms. And that is the sole takeaway from this blog post.

Jew Snyder Dragging Feet on Christian Cousins?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/dc-sports-bog/wp/2017/02/02/kirk-cousins-says-redskins-contract-offers-last-year-just-didnt-make-sense/?utm_term=.7926a745d720#comments

Like all jews, Daniel Snyder hates whites and prefers blacks. This is the real reason Kirk Cousins hasn't been signed to a long-term deal. Snyder was more than willing to sign low-character blacks who weren't even QBs to long-term, cap-busting deals (cough, Haynesworth), but when it comes to a QB who has turned his franchise around -- a QB he didn't even allow to compete for the starting job the year he came into the league -- he's nowhere to be found.

No writer will mention the racial animus driving Snyder. Now, as a businessman, and a money-lover, the jew will probably bite hard and sign the white christian eventually. It's one thing to indulge your loxism, but when it gets past a certain point, you have to admit reality and retrench. This white guy Cousins has given you two winning seasons in a row, is entering the prime of his career, and there's no reason to think he won't improve, if anything, in years to come. 

No writer for any "mainstream" publication, as I say, will mention the actual racial driver motivating the jew Snyder. It's ok to hate on him for 1,000 reasons, some valid, some trivial, but never racially. Correction never jewish-racially. Just lump him in as evil old rich white guy. Similar to FBI lumping crimes committed by mexicans in the White category for statistical purposes.

Since jews are hated but never hate, and since the two DC newspapers are owned by jews (Washington Post) and neocons (Washington Times), we'll never learn that it's jewish racial bigotry that first delayed Cousins' development, now drags feet on giving him the contract his future play is likely to merit (to take a smart Belichickian approach). Yes, jew Snyder's loxism has hurt the Redskins. But loxism, though it defines the tone of all common media, electronic or print, and sets a template for covering everything that matters - yet this powerfulest of forces rules unacknowledged. Jews are always portrayed as victims. Other people and groups are always guilty of wronging them. That's the media-generated perception; the view they want you to have. Of course, it might not just be a coincidence that jews own all the media circulating those claims. Jews are the only race that controls the mass media - or needs to. 

Jews are only the race in history that is hated by every other but hates no other itself. 

That's either highly remarkable or worthy of an extended raspberry.

Kirk Cousins Has a Higher Ceiling Than White-Dimming Analysts Think

http://www.csnmidatlantic.com/washington-redskins/sports-junkies-everything-will-crumble-if-redskins-lose-kirk-cousins-free-agency-kyle-shanahan

Everything will crumble if Cousins goes, guy says. Yep. They'll be a 5-6 win team instead of a 10-win team. Cousins is that rare QB who might actually have that higher ceiling than he's shown. He has only played two seasons. He has set passing records in those. But no, let's dump him and find something better that quite literally does not exist.

Not to mention - as this guy says - he's not going to cause off-the-field problems. Add to that, he stays healthy. Everything points to one conclusion, and in the other weighing pan is that he hasn't played well in big games. If you're rational you have to bet on Cousins.

Cousins is textbook example of the underrating of whiteness. If Cousins were black, the mouths that be would be screaming racism about Redskins' foot dragging. They'd be yelping to the moon about what a high potential Cousins has, how he's just about to enter the absolute center-cut pork chop years of his career. Who truly knows what he can do? Except pass for more yards than pretty much anyone?

But here's where the second antiwhite prejudice kicks in. Not only do blacks have higher ceilings than whites by virtue of being black, their success is attributed to their own efforts, not the receivers and backs supporting them, Compare Dak Prescott with Kirk Cousins. Cousins' success is attributed to his great receivers far more than Prescott's is attributed to his. But Prescott has a great RB, receivers and OL, whereas Cousins only has a great OL and receivers.

Just watch this year: Prescott will fall off significantly. That's my prediction. Cousins will have slightly lower numbers but better overall performance.

Cousins is a bit hinky or gun-shy. The guy in article says he got spooked early in 2016 and it lasted all year. There might be something to that. Because in 2015, he was fine in red zone. But it's also just the growing pains of getting used to starting games himself, getting repetitions with the main plays, and working with the people on his team, including the playcaller and the changing roster of running backs.

The Redskins are very close to being one of the top five teams, and the idea that they are even considering not signing their already statistically elite QB to a long-term contract is absurd.

Cousins studies things. He will see that he must run more often. And that he must panic less.

How much do you want to bet against him being capable of achieving these improvements?

How many bright young QBs have peaked before their third full season as starting QB? Very few if any. That means Cousins' best years, his best play, are still in front of him. Looking back, people will shake their heads that resigning him was ever under serious debate.

But typing this on the first of February 2017, I can assure you that it was.

Good Draft for DL?

ESPN draft analyst Mel Kiper Jr. said the defensive-line depth in this draft is as good as any he’s seen.

http://www.espn.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/75580/redskins-defensive-line-must-be-helped-by-free-agency-draft

Kirk Cousins Quotation on Marriage Shows His Mentality

"My wife's been a huge supporter to me, and I want people not to be afraid of marriage but to be excited about it," said Cousins.

Found this quotation researching Cousins. He's explaining why he wears a rubberized ring when he plays. Now transpose this attitude toward marriage into the key of his contractual relationship with the Washington Redskins. I think it's pretty clear how Cousins feels. He wants commitment.

Is there any other way to read it?

Is it not likelier he will play better once his professional marriage is consummated? If I were a betting man, I'd say yes.

ESPN Down Trend Continues While More Sports Media Members Get Openly Political

ESPN is at 87.8 million and falling... There are technical reasons and political reasons, the article speculates.

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/is-espns-liberal-political-agenda-contributing-to-its-serious-viewer-slump/

Leftism is a cult for white idiots and malocclusives, sex deviants and grabbag dysfunctionals. It's led by rational, racist jews who see it as the shortest line to their objective of white racial extinction. jews are a race. They hate all others. They perceive Whites as their most dangerous competitors. This  is loxism, and it's not going away until jews are counter-exterminated. Leftism carries its anti-White genocidal agenda, and conceals from the unthoughful its deepest motivation. Sports reporters or analysts are invariably leftists or silent. Jews have long ago gelded conservatives out of any racial views, which means they are de facto liberals too. Any who refused were long ago sent to the unemployment lines. If you weren't leftist, would you apply at ESPN? Or Washington Post? Or New York Times? Or Sports Illustrated? What would be the point?

Sports journalism is the same as political journalism: only one point of view is valid. Any genuinely different view is shunted to the corners of the internet. This ratchets the conformity over time, so that you get to a point, long ago passed in the west, where jew-leftists don't even really believe there is another point of view. The leftists called liberals don't think of their views as a position but as normal. Anyone opposed is a wacko. An extremist by definition. That they consider wanting national borders or keeping men out of women's restrooms an "extreme" position is why they were utterly clueless about the Trump revolution. Everyone they know, or at least everyone they know at work, thinks the same.

Here's an article in Bill Simmons' The Ringer about sports writers opening up about their political views.

https://theringer.com/sportswriters-media-donald-trump-politics-a8b332bc48cf#.fnwu7ao3h

But gaze at this (partial) list of writers and personalities who stuck pins into Trump over the weekend: Zach Lowe, Tim Kawakami, Pete Abraham, Charlotte Wilder, Greg Bedard, Pablo Torre, Howard Beck, Sarah Spain, Molly Knight, Stewart Mandel, Jemele Hill, Spencer Hall, Timothy Burke, Joe Vardon, and the proprietors of the MGoBlog. 

Any that expressed support? I don't watch ESPN or have cable tv, but I'm guessing no.

But read it. It shows the true cult mentality. This quotation, from the very top of ESPN, shows the problem:

 “Diversity and inclusion…are long-standing values that drive fundamental fairness while providing us with the widest possible pool of talent to create the smartest and most creative staff. We do not view this as a political stance but as a human stance.”

See - he doesn't see his politics as politics. It's just "normal" or "human." Everybody thinks this way. Apart from a tiny, weird, sick, disturbed few. This is precisely the problem. The guy has just written off half the country. Talk about solipsism.

These guys actually believe that they're not already injecting their politics into every word they write - and that this injection isnt felt by all who read them. Quite wrong. And they have only to read the comments below their published articles to see this is the case. But they don't. Or they simply don't care. Leftists write and "report" for themselves. They only care about how they look to their peers. The idea they're serving an audience is irrelevant, so long as they're drawing a check. Since these checks come from giant jew-owned corporations, and since the jews put their antiwhite political agenda ahead of profits, they really don't have to worry about "the bottom line." Because if one joint goes out of operation, the politics will be the same at the next.

Sports is mass politics by other means. As we've seen with newspapers, so it will be with cable: they would rather go out of business (or just shrink significantly) than cater to the intelligent white people who are their customer base. Nor is this unique to media. It was the same at, for example, Levi Strauss, the denim sewer.

Opponents of the (((media))) and its ideology are now talking like this:

http://www.rooshv.com/how-to-destroy-the-establishment-media

The fight will go on; the Internet is not quite the Great Equalizer, perhaps, but it certainly shows the distance between the jew-controlled junk media and their middle-class white customers. Sports is not a whit different from politics; indeed, to repeat, mass sports is mass politics by slightly different means. Or should that be memes.